 | CONNELL GRANGE SUPPLY WHERE THE CUSTOMER IS STILL THE COMPANY |
|
Printable Page
05/27 17:55 CDT Key Sens. Cruz, Cantwell look to break college sports logjam in
Congress with a bipartisan bill
Key Sens. Cruz, Cantwell look to break college sports logjam in Congress with a
bipartisan bill
By EDDIE PELLS
AP National Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) --- Two key senators involved in a long-simmering debate over
fixing college sports will introduce a bipartisan bill designed to break a
congressional logjam that would regulate payments to players, limit them to one
"free" transfer over their careers and create a "Lane Kiffin Rule" to restrict
coach movement during the season.
Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., the chair and ranking
member of the Senate Commerce Committee that oversees college sports, briefed
The Associated Press on details of the bill they crafted in hopes it can get
the 60 votes needed to clear the Senate.
"This is a stability bill, not just an NIL bill," Cruz said, referencing the
name, image and likeness payments that have led to football rosters with $30
million payrolls and reshaped the industry.
Cantwell said she and Cruz teamed up on the legislation "because he and I
really do believe the college sports system is in a bit of chaos."
The bill looks very much like the "best of" from a pair of legislative
proposals --- one called SCORE, another called SAFE --- that have gone nowhere
over the past several months. It contains two elements the NCAA has supported:
a limited antitrust exemption and a clause that would preempt much of the
patchwork of state laws currently regulating NIL.
Meredith Page, the chair of the NCAA Division I Student Athlete Advocacy
Committee and a former volleyball player at Radford, called the bill "a
phenomenal step," especially after the latest setback for the SCORE Act, which
the SAAC also supported.
"I think this has lots of great protections and gives the ability for us to
stablize the field that is so, so unstable right now," Page said.
NCAA President Charlie Baker said the association was reviewing the bill and
looked forward to "further productive dialogue with members of Congress."
Antitrust help College sports has been looking to Washington for help as it grapples with rising costs of paying players and an out-of-control transfer portal that have threatened smaller sports, many involving women, that make up the backbone of the U.S. Olympic pipeline. This bill, called the Protect College Sports Act, would offer what Cruz and Cantwell said was targeted antitrust protection for the likes of the NCAA and the College Sports Commission, which was part of the largely Republican-backed SCORE Act that many Democrats opposed. That would be in exchange for what Cruz said would be "public-facing protections" for athletes in several areas, including guarantees for health insurance and scholarships, more stringent regulations for NIL deals from third parties and agents who broker their deals. "I think it's better predictability," Cantwell said. "Why did we do it? Because when you've got thousands of athletes being cut, hundreds of programs being cut, the risk to the whole infrastructure was too high to not try to get better predictability."
Rules for players and coaches The bill would limit players to one unrestricted transfer over the course of their college careers --- a widely supported idea across the country --- and would adopt something close to the five-year eligibility period that the NCAA appears ready to enact next month. The bill also tries to regulate coaching movement. Kiffin's sudden move to LSU from rival Mississippi while the Rebels were preparing for the College Football Playoff last season put a fine point on an issue that has only gotten worse in an era where teams spend millions to fill out rapidly shifting football rosters: Schools have less patience (and more money) to devote to hiring coaches for a quick fix. Under terms of the bill, midseason coaching changes would be prohibited. "It's not fair or right to poach a coach in the middle of the season while the team is still competing," Cruz said. "There's a reason the NFL has a rule that you can't do that. Obviously, NFL teams hire coaches away from each other but they don't do so in the middle of the season."
Media rights money The bill would rework the Sports Broadcasting Act to allow conferences to pool their TV rights --- a move proponents have said could add billions of dollars to the ecosystem in a conclusion the Southeastern and Big Ten Conferences believe is inaccurate. The senators said leagues wouldn't be required to join the media pooling but those that do would have to use a percentage of any increase from that to support women's and Olympic sports. That alone could be a dealbreaker for the SEC, which has reportedly been discussing topics including breaking away from the NCAA and allowing collective bargaining for athletes at its league meetings in Florida this week. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, along with Jim Phillips of the Atlantic Coast and Brett Yormark of the Big 12 all said they were reviewing the bill, with Sankey saying "bipartisan engagement in Washington on these issues is critical."
Can the measure pass? The SCORE Act, which garnered little support from Democrats, was on the House schedule last week but was abruptly pulled off when the Congressional Black Caucus and NAACP came out against it. Even if it had squeaked by in the razor-tight House, it had virtually no chance of passing as written in the Senate, where it would need 60 votes to break a possible filibuster. "The Congressional Black Caucus and I have the same objective: stop the ?SEC SCORE Act,'" said Cantwell, referencing the SEC as one of dozens of conferences who have supported that bill. Some Democrats were reluctant to support a bill, like SCORE, that prohibited college athletes from being classified as employees of their schools. The new bill takes what Cantwell said was a neutral stance on the issue of employment. But it does not resolve all of Democrats' complaints, as Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., explained in a news release shortly after news of the bill hit. "It gives the NCAA an antitrust exemption that no other industry gets just so they can keep underpaying the athletes," he said. "Sure, there are some good things for players in this bill, but this seems like a great deal for the NCAA and the rich guys who run college sports, and a bad deal for athletes." Mit Winter, a Missouri attorney who specializes in sports law, said the proposal was so sprawling he was skeptical it will pass as is. "When you start getting into the stuff about giving the CSC and NCAA antitrust exemptions and liability protection from enforcing rules on athlete denial of compensation, I think that's where things get a little more dicey," he said. ___ AP College Sports Writer Eric Olson contributed. ___ AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Antitrust help College sports has been looking to Washington for help as it grapples with rising costs of paying players and an out-of-control transfer portal that have threatened smaller sports, many involving women, that make up the backbone of the U.S. Olympic pipeline. This bill, called the Protect College Sports Act, would offer what Cruz and Cantwell said was targeted antitrust protection for the likes of the NCAA and the College Sports Commission, which was part of the largely Republican-backed SCORE Act that many Democrats opposed. That would be in exchange for what Cruz said would be "public-facing protections" for athletes in several areas, including guarantees for health insurance and scholarships, more stringent regulations for NIL deals from third parties and agents who broker their deals. "I think it's better predictability," Cantwell said. "Why did we do it? Because when you've got thousands of athletes being cut, hundreds of programs being cut, the risk to the whole infrastructure was too high to not try to get better predictability."
Rules for players and coaches The bill would limit players to one unrestricted transfer over the course of their college careers --- a widely supported idea across the country --- and would adopt something close to the five-year eligibility period that the NCAA appears ready to enact next month. The bill also tries to regulate coaching movement. Kiffin's sudden move to LSU from rival Mississippi while the Rebels were preparing for the College Football Playoff last season put a fine point on an issue that has only gotten worse in an era where teams spend millions to fill out rapidly shifting football rosters: Schools have less patience (and more money) to devote to hiring coaches for a quick fix. Under terms of the bill, midseason coaching changes would be prohibited. "It's not fair or right to poach a coach in the middle of the season while the team is still competing," Cruz said. "There's a reason the NFL has a rule that you can't do that. Obviously, NFL teams hire coaches away from each other but they don't do so in the middle of the season."
Media rights money The bill would rework the Sports Broadcasting Act to allow conferences to pool their TV rights --- a move proponents have said could add billions of dollars to the ecosystem in a conclusion the Southeastern and Big Ten Conferences believe is inaccurate. The senators said leagues wouldn't be required to join the media pooling but those that do would have to use a percentage of any increase from that to support women's and Olympic sports. That alone could be a dealbreaker for the SEC, which has reportedly been discussing topics including breaking away from the NCAA and allowing collective bargaining for athletes at its league meetings in Florida this week. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, along with Jim Phillips of the Atlantic Coast and Brett Yormark of the Big 12 all said they were reviewing the bill, with Sankey saying "bipartisan engagement in Washington on these issues is critical."
Can the measure pass? The SCORE Act, which garnered little support from Democrats, was on the House schedule last week but was abruptly pulled off when the Congressional Black Caucus and NAACP came out against it. Even if it had squeaked by in the razor-tight House, it had virtually no chance of passing as written in the Senate, where it would need 60 votes to break a possible filibuster. "The Congressional Black Caucus and I have the same objective: stop the ?SEC SCORE Act,'" said Cantwell, referencing the SEC as one of dozens of conferences who have supported that bill. Some Democrats were reluctant to support a bill, like SCORE, that prohibited college athletes from being classified as employees of their schools. The new bill takes what Cantwell said was a neutral stance on the issue of employment. But it does not resolve all of Democrats' complaints, as Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., explained in a news release shortly after news of the bill hit. "It gives the NCAA an antitrust exemption that no other industry gets just so they can keep underpaying the athletes," he said. "Sure, there are some good things for players in this bill, but this seems like a great deal for the NCAA and the rich guys who run college sports, and a bad deal for athletes." Mit Winter, a Missouri attorney who specializes in sports law, said the proposal was so sprawling he was skeptical it will pass as is. "When you start getting into the stuff about giving the CSC and NCAA antitrust exemptions and liability protection from enforcing rules on athlete denial of compensation, I think that's where things get a little more dicey," he said. ___ AP College Sports Writer Eric Olson contributed. ___ AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
